What you can expect from the Narwal Freo Z Ultra
What testers say about the Narwal Freo Z Ultra
The Narwal Freo Z Ultra was Narwal's flagship in late 2024 and won two awards at Vacuum Wars then, which put it in the top five of their list. It is an all-in-one robot with two spinning, triangular mop pads, a station that empties the bin into a 2.5-liter bag good for about 120 days, washes and dries the pads, refills the tank and optionally doses Narwal's own detergent. It recognizes obstacles with two cameras and two chips.
The testers praised that obstacle recognition above all: the best score Vacuum Wars had measured to date, close to perfect, with 120 pre-programmed kinds of objects and lighting for dark corners. Mopping was well above average thanks to pads pressing down with 2.6 pounds; dried stains came off better than with an electric mop. The map was ready in five minutes, a vacuum-and-mop run took 41 minutes, shorter than average with excellent coverage, and battery efficiency was far above average. Debris of every kind was picked up almost completely on hard floors and carpet.
The reservations: Narwal quotes no official run time, the pads lift 0.5 inches but are not detached, and newer models have raised the bar since. It has since been succeeded, so it turns up mainly second-hand or as leftover stock, and there it is a robot that was among the best of 2024; for a new purchase, look at the Freo X10 Pro or the Flow 2.
Pros
- Dodged obstacles almost flawlessly, the best result the testers had seen then Vacuum Wars ↗
- Spinning pads removed dried stains better than a wet-dry floor cleaner Vacuum Wars ↗
- Picked up pet hair from carpet well and kept long hair off the brush Vacuum Wars ↗
- Never got stuck on chair legs or swallowed cables and socks TechRadar ↗
- Spinning mops lifted dried-on juice and sauce stains from tiles TechRadar ↗
- Runs quietly, especially when it is mopping TechRadar ↗
Cons
- Struggled to pull embedded sand out of carpet in the lab test Vacuum Wars ↗
- Behaved erratically in tight enclosed test areas, spoiling several runs Vacuum Wars ↗
- Could not clear fine dusty debris from carpet even after repeated passes TechRadar ↗
- Mopping takes very long because it keeps returning to rewet its pads TechRadar ↗
- Self-emptying sometimes failed even when the app reported it had worked TechRadar ↗
Where the testers disagree
- Mopping: Vacuum Wars: Spinning pads removed dried stains better than a wet-dry floor cleaner · TechRadar: Spinning mops lifted dried-on juice and sauce stains from tiles against TechRadar: Mopping takes very long because it keeps returning to rewet its pads
Each point sums up, in our words, the review of the test it names, and its link leads to that review. We do not summarize RTINGS or Wirecutter: their lists are linked above.





